Aavik, Johannes 1924. Õigekeelsuse ja keeleuuenduse põhimõtted. Yhes keeleuuenduste astmelise liigitusega. Tartu: Istandik.
Aavik, Johannes 1936. Eesti õigekeelsuse õpik ja grammatika. Tartu: Noor-Eesti.
Arkhipov, Alexandre 2009, Comitative as a cross-linguistically valid category. – New Challenges in Typology. Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions. P. Epps, A. Alexandre (eds.). Mouton de Gruyter, 223–246.
Biber, Douglas 2009. Corpus-based and corpus-driven analysis of language variation and use. –The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. B. Heine, H. Narrog (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–170.
Bickel, Balthasar 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis. – , Clausehierarchy and clauselinking. The syntax and pragmatics interface. I. Bril (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 51–101.
Bickel, Balthasar 2011. Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (SinoTibetan). – P.K. Austin, O. Bond, D. Nathan, L. Marten (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3. London: SOAS, 3–13.
Bybee, Joan 2010. A usage-based perspective on language. – Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press, 1-13.
Deumert, Ana, Wim Vanderbusche 2003. Standard languages. Taxonomies and histories – Germanic Standardizations. Ana, Deumert, Wim Vanderbusche (eds.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1–14.
Dingemanse, Mark, N. J. Enfield 2015. Other-Initiated Repair across Languages: Towards a Typology of Conversational Structures. – Open Linguistics, 1, 98–118. opli-2014-0007
Dingemanse, Mark, Joe Blythe, Tyko Dirksmeyer 2014. Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology. – Studies in Language, 38, 5-43. Dingemanse_Blythe_Dirksmeyer_2014
Dufter, Andreas, Jürg Fleischer, Guido Seiler 2009. Introduction. – Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar. Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer, Guido Seiler (eds.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–20. http://books.google.ee/books?id=ZMArEnZVmrkC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Erelt, Mati 2008. Concerning the relationship of the comitative construction to the coordinating construction in Estonian. – Linguistica Uralica XLIV, 2, 97–107. http://www.kirj.ee/public/Linguistica_Uralica/2008/issue_2/ling-2008-2-97-107.pdf
Habicht, Külli 2000. Grammaticalization of Adpositions in Old Literary Estonian. – Estonian: Typological Studies IV, Tartu (Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 14), 19–58. http://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/40522/erelt_estonian_4_ocr.pdf
Habicht, Külli, Ilona Tragel 2014. Verbiga saama väljendatud leksikaalsed kategooriad ja konstruktsioonid. – Keel ja Kirjandus, 11, 826 – 844.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard 2001. Syntax in interaction. Form and function of yes/no interrogatives in spoken standard French. – Studies in language, 25, 3, 463-519.
Hennoste, Tiit parandusest 5.3. naabruspaarid II_partneriparandus
Ibbotson, Paul 2013. The scope of usage-based theory. – Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255/full
Kemmer, Suzanne, Michael Barlow 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. – Usage-based models of language, Michael Barlow and Susanne Kemmer (eds.), Stanford: CSLI, 7–28.
Kilgi, Annika 2007. Misjonilingvistika – Oma Keel, 2, 24–26. http://www.emakeeleselts.ee/omakeel/2007_2/OK_2007-2_03.pdf
Klavan, Jane 2012. Evidence in linguistics: corpus-linguistic and experimental methods for studying grammatical synonymy. Dissertationes philologiae estonicae universitatis Tartuensis 15. Tartu: University of Tartu Press. https://dspace.utlib.ee/dspace/bitstream/handle/10062/27865/klavan_jane.pdf
Laitinen, Lea 2004. Grammaticalization and standardization. Up and down the cline. – The nature of grammaticalization. Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, Harry Perridon (eds.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 247–262.
Lehmann, Christian, Yong-Min Shin 2005. The functional domain of concomitance. A typological study of instrumental and comitative relations. – Typological studies in participationChristian Lehmann (ed.) . Berlin: Akademie (Studia Typologica, 7), 9–104.
http://www.christianlehmann.eu/publ/Concomitance.pdf
Lepajõe, Marju 1998. Johannes Gutslaffi „Grammatilised vaatlused“. – Johannes Gutslaff, Observationes grammaticae circa linguam esthonicam. Tõlkinud ja väljaande koostanud Marju Lepajõe. Jaak Peebo (toim.). Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 10, 285–316.
Metslang, Helena 2013. Grammatical relations in Estonian: subject, object and beyond. Dissertationes philologiae estonicae universitatis Tartuensis 33. Tartu: University of Tartu Press. http://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/30288/metslang_helena.pdf
Metslang, Helle 2001. On the Developments of the Estonian Aspect: The Verbal Particle ära. In: Circum-Baltic Languages, vol. 2: Grammar and typology. (Studies in Language Companion Series 55.) Eds.: Östen Dahl, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 2001, 443-479. https://www.academia.edu/698310/On_the_developments_of_the_Estonian_aspect._The_verbal_particle_%C3%A4ra
Metslang, Helle 2009. Isepäine üldküsilause. – Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 55, 119–137.
Mihkels, Krista 2013. Keel, keha ja kaardikepp: õpetaja algatatud parandussekventside multimodaalne analüüs. Doktoritöö, Tartu Ülikool, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus. https://dspace.utlib.ee/dspace/bitstream/handle/10062/29189/mihkels_krista.pdf
Märtson, Helle-Mari 2012. Abimäärsõna ära perfektiivsuse väljendajana emakeeleõpetuse vaatenurgast. Magistritöö. Tartu. http://www.murre.ut.ee/arhiiv/naita_pilt.php?materjal=kasikiri&materjal_id=D1764&sari=D&formaat=A4
Narrog, Heiko 2009. Varieties of Instrumental. – Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer. The Oxford Handbook of Case. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. pp. 593-600.
Nevalainen, Terttu, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta 2008. Exploring the dynamics of linguistic variation through public and private corpora. – The dynamics of linguistic variation: corpus evidence on English past and present. Studies in language variation 2. T. Nevalainen, I. Taavitsainen, P. Pahta, M. Korhonen (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1–9.
Prass, Kerli 2011. Saama- ja hakkama-tulevik tänapäeva eesti kirjakeeles. Magistritöö, käsikiri, Tallinna Ülikool.
Schlotthauer, Susan 2010. Kontaktinduzierter Sprachwandel im Bereich der estnischen Verbrektion? Teil I: Verbkomplemente in Form kasusmarkierter Nominalphrasen. − SKY Journal of Linguistics 23, 265–300. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2010/Schlotthauer_netti.pdf
Stolz, Thomas 2001. To be with X is to have X: comitatives, instrumentals, locative and predicative possession. – Linguistics 39–2, 321–350.
Stolz, Thomas 2001. On Circum-Baltic instrumentals and comitatives: To and fro coherence. – The Circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contact. Vol. 2: Grammar and typology. (Studies in language Companion 55.). Ö. Dahl, M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 591–612.
Stolz, Thomas Cornelia Stroh, Aina Urdze 2006. On Comitatives and Related Categories: A Typological Study with Special Focus on the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. https://books.google.ee/books?id=KYwb6-w1AjkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=on+comitatives+and+related+categories&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uzhwUdr1EYfA9gSUsIHoAg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh, Aina Urdze 2009. Varieties of Comitative. In Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer. The Oxford Handbook of Case. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. pp. 593–600.
Uuspõld, Ellen 1997. Mõningaist liiasusnähtustest eesti keelekasutuses. – Keel ja Kirjandus, 11, 743-747.